|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
November 29th, 2012, 15:40 | #1 |
Airsoft science - Sound level testing
Airsoft "science" - Sound level testing
When firing, low sound signature = less chance of detection, less chance of the opponent hearing the shot coming (and ducking). After going thru an article in Airsoft International which tested the use of silencer, I had this idea: Using a smart phone (android) with an app that measure sound level (in decibel), I m gonna try a basic experiment: I ll compare the sound level of some AEG and BA in my collection, with and without silencer, Will do so while trying to maintain the same testing condition for all AEG and BA (same ammo type and weight, same position of the recording device (phone), thinking about placing it 3 feets from the piston impact point, indoor in my basement with minimal environmental noise (also minimise the noise of BB impact). Anyone has hint / recommendation on how to improve this experiment? My app can also measure vibration, but not the "type" of noise (frequency: high pitched, etc) Thanks
__________________
|
|
November 29th, 2012, 15:42 | #2 |
E-01
|
Test GBBRs, too!
__________________
|
November 29th, 2012, 15:46 | #3 |
Prancercise Guru
|
Why not put the mike downrange? 3 feet from the mechanism is not going to give you a fair read on what a target hears.
__________________
Airsoft, where nothing is hurt but feelings. |
November 29th, 2012, 15:47 | #4 |
November 29th, 2012, 15:51 | #5 |
True, sadly, I m limited by the indoor space i have could go 20 ft max, worth it?
__________________
|
|
November 29th, 2012, 15:54 | #6 |
Prancercise Guru
|
If you go without the BB can you go farther?
__________________
Airsoft, where nothing is hurt but feelings. |
November 29th, 2012, 16:01 | #7 |
Not really, also, shooting a bb versus shooting dry would impact the noise level.
I ll try close to piston impact, with and without bb and same test, the furthest i can go indoor
__________________
|
|
November 29th, 2012, 16:41 | #8 |
You should use a computer to do the recording, with a proper mic and at a decent sampling rate. The problem with using these cheesy sound level apps is that just like those analog Amperage meters , they miss out on the spikes and detail. You might end up concluding that a given AEG is much louder on account of its gear spin-up or your phone's crappy microphone when in fact the overall report from the muzzle is quiet.
__________________
"Mah check" Now you know |
|
November 29th, 2012, 16:46 | #9 |
What would qualify as a good mike and software?
__________________
|
|
November 29th, 2012, 17:08 | #10 |
I think you need to understand the source of sound first.
AEG sound are from the motor, gear, nozzle predominately. Therefore the sound of bb leaving the barrel is kinda pointless. Try dry firing it and plug the barrel to test the difference in black n white. |
|
November 29th, 2012, 17:28 | #11 |
Green Synergy
|
Does the sound of the mechbox project down the barrel in any sizeable quantity? Buddy fired his KA M4 next to my head on auto at CQB (Think Blackhawk Down style) and my hearing wasn't normal for a couple of minutes. His motor height was off a lot though.
Last edited by MaybeStopCalling; November 29th, 2012 at 17:31.. |
November 29th, 2012, 17:38 | #12 |
Tys
|
Want to see where the sound comes from?
Throw a towel over (or wrap it loosely around) the body of the gun and fire some shots....then without. Then throw a thick towel over the muzzle and do the same. Don't plug it completely or else you'll cause an air brake in the cylinder. From gas and AEG/PTWs a lot of the sound comes from the mechbox/action and a suppressor may change the overall tone/pitch of things but won't really suppress it. Works well on a BA though. But by all means do the tests. It'd be a good reference to take a reading where the shooters ear would be as well. |
November 29th, 2012, 17:44 | #13 |
I've done work on suppressing gas airsoft pistols VERY effectively. While at the cost of impact power and velocity, the guns i've done have been pretty much near inaudibility at 10 - 15 ft.
|
|
November 29th, 2012, 17:46 | #14 | |
Quote:
Sound like a TM mk23 to me
__________________
|
||
November 29th, 2012, 17:48 | #15 |
"bb bukakke" KING!
|
there is a noticeable difference muzzle side when you use a foam filled supressor... there's less of a snap, though most of the noise does come from the gearbox/motor.
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|