|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
View Poll Results: Eotech 551 Vs. 552 | |||
551 | 1 | 12.50% | |
552 | 7 | 87.50% | |
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
May 23rd, 2009, 14:20 | #16 | |
Quote:
|
||
May 23rd, 2009, 14:35 | #17 |
Took the words right out of my mouth. They're both the same as far as reticle goes (unless you go from an early generation to the most current, but it's minor). And batteries last a long time, you might not even use 1 set in an entire season. The OP did ask about Eotech 551 or 552, not "clone of Eotech 551 or 552". Not everyone has clones.
__________________
Age verifier Northern Alberta Democracy is two wolves and a sheep discussing what's for dinner. Freedom is the wolves limping away while the sheep reloads. Never confuse freedom with democracy. |
|
May 23rd, 2009, 14:46 | #18 |
May 23rd, 2009, 14:48 | #19 |
Ah, fair enough - I didn't know that the 553 repros used AAAs. The real 552s use AAs as well. However, even good rechargeables don't last particularly long - I tend to recharge them after every session since the "low battery" pulsing reticle shows up. No idea how long it takes to drain them after that occurs.
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|